Cases 21 - 30 of 504
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Rogene Earl Holden
Satterfield v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2022hc02212
Petitioner:
Luther Earl Satterfield
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Elrod v. B.O.P.
as 5:2022ct03413
Plaintiff:
Kevin Earl Elrod
Defendant:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cooper v. Brown et al
as 5:2022ct03364
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Cooper
Defendant:
Sgt. Brown and Warden Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUESDALE v TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adaesha Truesdale, ALFRED ALLISON, ALICIA BOWE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TMX Finance of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Walton v. USA
as 2:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
James Earl Walton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Corbett v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03308
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Venetia S. Outlaw, Mr. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02121
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Byrd, Jr. and Kenneth Earl Byrd, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SHAWN LINDSEY BRITT, TONY BETHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
