Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Edmonds et al v. Berhe et al
as 1:2018cv01222
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Wanda Edmonds and Mr. Tony Edmonds
Defendant:
Yonas H Ghebreyesus, Model Transport, LLC and Mr. Abraham Berhe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zagorski v. Haslam et al
as 3:2018cv01035
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Tony Mays and Tony Parker
Plaintiff:
Edmond Zagorski
Intervenor:
Stephen Michael West, David Earl Miller, Terry Lynn King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zagorski v. Haslam et al
as 3:2018cv01205
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Tony Mays and Tony Parker
Plaintiff:
Edmond Zagorski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickens v. Edmond, et al
as 2:2018cv02643
Undetermined:
Jimmy Moore
Defendant:
Kingdom Life Transport, Inc and James Edmond
Plaintiff:
Betty Mickens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDMONDS et al v. XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.
as 2:2018cv02254
Plaintiff:
RAVEN EDMONDS and DANTE EDMONDS
Defendant:
XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilken v. Jefferson County et al (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
William Wilken
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Tennessee, C Edmonds, K Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Northington v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00850
Plaintiff:
Maude Northington
Defendant:
United States of America, Megan J. Brennan and Marvin L. Edmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Edmonds v. DirectTV LLC
as 1:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edmonds
Defendant:
DirectTV LLC
Miscellaneou:
Linda K. Fulghum
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Deramus v. McCoig
as 3:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
Edmond B Deramus
Defendant:
Bud McCoig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ricky Edmonds
Defendant:
Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC and Gestamp North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
