Cases 21 - 30 of 205
Glenn v. Basham et al
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Glenn
Defendant:
C/o Basham, C/o McCoy and Warden Erdos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. Chamber-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Defendant:
Annette Chamber-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Linnea Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark AlstonIn re: Mark Alston
as 22-3088
Petitioner:
In re: MARK ALSTON
Respondent:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden
Hart v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Anthony L Hart
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGowan v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGowan
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Mr. Cadogen, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manetirony Clervrain v. Jamie Dimon, et al
as 22-1077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Wilkins v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tevyn Nevada Lee Wilkins
Defendant:
Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, Ronald Erdos, Linnea Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allah v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
El-Barseem K. Allah
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Ron Erdos, L. Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
