Cases 21 - 30 of 2,129
Bechel et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bechel, Marcia Hickson, Raven El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Salamon et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Fabian Alexander Cook
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. CORREDOR et al
as 1:2024cv21059
Plaintiff:
Progressive Express Insurance Company
Defendant:
EDGAR CORREDOR, HALLEY ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC., SORREL ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gatz v. Fabian et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Plaintiff:
Randy Gatz
Defendant:
Tiffany Fabian, Deorea Sunday, Shantina Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray et al v. Mills et al
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Fabian Eddy Gray and Adelma Mestas
Defendant:
Nicholas Mills and Patrick F. Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
