Cases 21 - 30 of 61
COOK v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2019cv04096
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Petitioner:
FABIAN ALEXANDER COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FABIAN et al v. SHENKAN et al
as 2:2019cv00582
Plaintiff:
FABIAN LEGAL SERVICES, LLC. and RUDY FABIAN
Defendant:
SHENKAN INJURY LAWYERS, LLC. and RICHARD E. SHENKAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNS et al v. FEMIANI et al
as 1:2018cv00391
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP, ENCOMPASS INSURANCE, THE PA STATE POLICE, STATE OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. BURNS and KAREN K. BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2018cv02114
Plaintiff:
OMAR SHARIFF CASH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOHN KELLY, KRISTJEN NIELSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGH et al v. FULLER et al
as 2:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
ANGELA J. PUGH and LARRY W. PUGH
Defendant:
FABIAN FULLER and SMART TECH & UTILITIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRISON v. ROCHLIN et al
as 3:2016cv01417
Plaintiff:
Fabian T. Morrison
Defendant:
Karen E. Rochlin , Coleman Medium Officials , Tamyra Javis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FABIAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01257
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO FABIAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VASQUEZ v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2015cv04297
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, ARWIN SANTEE, THOMAS K. FLEMING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FABIAN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
PENNE FABIAN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY and MARC CHERNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
