Cases 21 - 30 of 838
GARRETT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
MARKESE GARRETT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
STAR GREGORY A. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, FRANK VANIHEL, K. FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL, CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DAN FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANDEFORD v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
ZACHARY STANDEFORD
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIMES v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIMES
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, COOPER, RANDY PERCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Vanihel et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
William R. Grimes
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, Mrs. Cooper, Randy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
