Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Hapenny v. Lowell General Hospital
as 1:2020cv12298
Plaintiff:
Kim Hapenny
Defendant:
Lowell General Hospital
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kane v. Mass General Hospital
as 1:2020cv11266
Defendant:
Mass General Hospital
Plaintiff:
Patricia Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10695
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SYED K. RAFI PHD, v. Harvard University Medical School et al
as 1:2020cv10521
Plaintiff:
SYED K. RAFI PHD, and Syed Rafi, PhD
Defendant:
Harvard University Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Rafi v. Harvard University Medical School et al
as 1:2020cv10038
Defendant:
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Children's Hospital Boston and others
Plaintiff:
PhD Syed K. Rafi and Pro Se Party Syed K. Rafi, PhD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Lowell General Hospital v. OptumRx, Inc.
as 1:2019cv11795
Plaintiff:
Lowell General Hospital
Defendant:
OptumRx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. Massachusetts General Hospital System et al
as 1:2019cv11470
Defendant:
Governor Charles Baker, State of Massachusetts Board Health, Mental Health Legal Advisors Commitee and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LeTendre v. Lowell General Hospital et al
as 1:2019cv10722
Defendant:
Lowell General Hospital and Maureen Fitzpatrick
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline LeTendre
Not Yet Classified:
Judge Donald L. Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
