Cases 21 - 30 of 158
Garcia v. Chevalier et al
as 3:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Darren Chevalier, Mclain, Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barletta v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Barletta
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Mulligan, Dave Maiga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flete-Fulvio v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01057
Petitioner:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flete-Garcia v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01145
Petitioner:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosa v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, William Mulligan, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
Glenn Raphael Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gawlik v. Quiros et al
as 3:2021cv01549
Plaintiff:
Jan M. Gawlik
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Cook, Mudano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01394
Plaintiff:
Esther Garcia
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
