Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Garrett v. Ister LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05529
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Garrett
Defendant:
Elodia Khoury, Ister LLC and Ister LLC an Arizona corporation doing business as Apache Mini Market
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hill-Rom Services Incorporated v. Convergence Systems Limited et al
as 2:2019cv02223
Defendant:
Jerry Garrett and Convergence Systems Limited
Plaintiff:
Hill-Rom Services Incorporated
Deetz v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00966
Defendant:
Unknown Salyer, Corizon Health Services Incorporated, Kent Ainslie and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett J Deetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2019cv00852
Defendant:
Michael Pezzelle, Andrew Walag, Mesa, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garrett v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00639
Plaintiff:
Debra K Garrett
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04419
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Garrett H Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De Luca v. Bradford et al
as 4:2018cv00549
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Garrett Bradford and Unknown Bradford
Plaintiff:
Keith De Luca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garrett v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03765
Plaintiff:
James E Garrett
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. Transtyle Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02420
Defendant:
Jaime Marin-Hernandez, Faramarz Sadeghi, Saba's Limo Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Cooper
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Ryan v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2018cv01356
Plaintiff:
Jason Garrett Ryan
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
