Cases 21 - 30 of 303
Ramales v. Hadid
as 1:2023cv07060
Plaintiff:
Ulices Ramales
Defendant:
Jelena Noura "Gigi" Hadid
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
(PC) Miles v. Verdurossa et al
as 2:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Georgia Miles
Defendant:
Michelle Verdurossa, Nick Manichs, CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allan v. Gigi et al
as 1:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Rani Allan
Defendant:
Daniel Nathan Gigi, Shlomo Gigi, Arlington County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Reyes v. Matteson
as 2:2023cv01205
Petitioner:
Isidro Reyes
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Reyes v. Matteson
as 1:2023cv00958
Petitioner:
Isidro Reyes
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Matteson
as 3:2023cv02586
Petitioner:
Brewster D. Phelps
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gage v. Matteson
as 4:2023cv02395
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Gage
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cunningham v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
as 3:2023cv20625
Plaintiff:
Genevieve GiGi Cunningham
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woody v. Matteson et al
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
Guy Woody
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gigi et al v. Hiscox Insurance Company Inc.
as 1:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
Idan Ben Gigi and Auratio, Inc.
Defendant:
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
