Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bartlett v. MidAmerica Outdoors, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Heather Bartlett
Defendant:
MidAmerica Outdoors, LLC, MidAmerica Power Sports LLC, Gayla Robinett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arndt v. Peery et al
as 5:2021cv00584
Defendant:
Peggy Kates, Lisa Epperson, Gessica Sewell and others
Plaintiff:
David Arndt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodall v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Heather Renee Woodall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perez v. Morales et al
as 5:2021cv00228
Defendant:
P Stuckey, Robert Morales, Comanche County Courthouse and others
Plaintiff:
Salvador Perez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macy v. BAN NH, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00658
Plaintiff:
Heather Macy
Defendant:
Betty Ann Nursing Center and BAN NH LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Heuson v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2020cv01240
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Heather Heuson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
L.G. v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Rabekah Mooneyham, Board of Corrections, Penny Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
L. G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00893
Defendant:
Rabekah Mooneyham, Board of Corrections, Penny Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
L G
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
