Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hooker v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03400
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Cawthon et al
as 1:2012cv00333
Defendant:
Aaron Cawthon and Chuck Hooker
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen,et al v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Charlie Allen , Sharon Allen , William Tucker and others
Defendant:
Xcel Energy, Inc. and Southwestern Public Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hooker v. USA
as 3:2011cv00933
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd et al
as 1:2009cv00777
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd, Yamaha Motor Corporation USA and Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Hooker et al v. Dallas Independent School District et al
as 3:2009cv01289
Plaintiff:
Tara Hooker and Louis Hooker
Defendant:
Dallas Independent School District, TEA and Linda Tokoly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker et al v. Dallas Independent School Board
as 3:2009cv00676
Plaintiff:
Tara Hooker and L.H.
Defendant:
Dallas Independent School Board
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hooker v. Curtis et al
as 2:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Hooker
Defendant:
L Curtis, E C Williams and V L Brisher
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hooker v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv00445
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hooker
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hooker v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv02092
Petitioner:
Alton Randall Hooker
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
