Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Silva v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv11381
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Silva
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Thomas Dickhaut, Duane J. MacEachern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Dubois et al
as 1:2010cv11306
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lyons
Defendant:
Marc Dubois and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasheed v. D'Antonio et al
as 1:2010cv11253
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Angela D'Antonio, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shedlock v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv11249
Plaintiff:
Paul F. Shedlock
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Harold W. Clarke, Michael Corsini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valerio v. Clarke
as 1:2010cv10567
Petitioner:
Ramon Valerio
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crowell v. Clarke
as 1:2010cv10502
Petitioner:
Richard Crowell
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davila v. Clarke
as 1:2010cv10267
Petitioner:
Victor Davila
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pereira v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv10238
Plaintiff:
Scott Pereira
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Allison Hallet, Christopher LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union v. Department of Corrections et al.
as 1:2010cv10223
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union
Defendant:
Department of Corrections of Massachusetts and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudman et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv10130
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hudman, Kelvin Holley, Dana Duteau and others
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Robert Murphy and Justin W. Prario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
