Cases 21 - 30 of 630
OBUZOR v. CLAYTON et al
as 2:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
JOANNA OBUZOR
Defendant:
JESSE CLAYTON, ROSS KENNEDY, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARPER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
SHEILA HARPER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADLEY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY BRADLEY
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY doing business as ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ORLANDO L. HARPER, LAURA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv01562
Petitioner:
DYLONDRIA MURPHY
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDMONDS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
MELISSA EDMONDS
Defendant:
WARDEN HARPER and DAVID URBAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv01353
Petitioner:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BURSE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
TYRONE A. BURSE, SR. and TYRONE BURSE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER and PATROLMAN STEVE KESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF HELEN HARPER v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv02364
Plaintiff:
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF HELEN HARPER
Defendant:
ROBERT J. HARPER
BEY v. KRAUS et al
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
HARUN BEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN KRAUS, CHIEF DEPUTY JOHN A. KEARNEY, DEPUTY MIKE FROST and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
