Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 192
HARTMAN v. HENRY CLAY TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2021cv01078
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE HARTMAN, JR.
Defendant: HENRY CLAY TOWNSHIP, CHARLES MYERS, WILLIAM HAYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
HARTMAN v. SACKLER et al
as 2:2021cv02001
Defendant: RICHARD SACKLER, RALPH SNYDERMAN, THERESA SACKLER and others
Plaintiff: PAUL HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 73 U.S.C. § 201
Lane v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant: Barry Karwowski, Harold Kertes, John Battenberg and others
Plaintiff: James T. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTMAN v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01004
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff: MICHELLE HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. York County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00247
Defendant: John Doe IXX, John Doe(s) XV-XVII, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff: Paul J. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Albert We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02444
Defendant: Scott E. Albert
Plaintiff: Mel Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Cocker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02279
Defendant: Randy Cocker
Plaintiff: Mel Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Heinly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02280
Defendant: Steven T. Heinly
Plaintiff: Mel Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Wiczkowski We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02281
Defendant: Brian A. Wiczkowski
Plaintiff: Mel Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?