Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Hicks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02661
Plaintiff:
Christy Hicks and Ryan Hicks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03309
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hicks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03291
Plaintiff:
Martina Watson Hicks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2015cv01591
Plaintiff:
Xavier Sanchez
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents, Michael Crow, Ronald Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwake v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
David Otto Schwake
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents, Michael M Crow, Kevin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanley v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2015cv00522
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents , James Rund , Ronald Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olympian Labs Incorporated v. JT Naturals LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Olympian Labs Incorporated
Defendant:
JT Naturals LLC, JT Naturals USA LLC, Jeff Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APPS Broadcast Network Incorporated v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01717
Plaintiff:
APPS Broadcast Network Incorporated
Defendant:
David A Thomas, Unknown Thomas, Jeffrey P Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Taylor v. Ryan
as 4:2014cv02049
Plaintiff:
Damian Anthony-Lamar Taylor
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, T Schroeder, A Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
