Cases 21 - 30 of 105
HOLMES v. EMKES
as 1:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
CYNTHIA SUE EMKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLMES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. City of Lafayette et al
as 4:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
CITY OF LAFAYETTE, LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LONNIE WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GODWIN v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROGER GODWIN
Defendant:
GILBERT, DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELLIS v. VIKKI et al
as 1:2021cv02841
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
VIKKI, HOLMES, POOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE GODWIN, ADEEB OMAR ASAMA LAIDEN and ADEEB OMAR OSAMA LAIDEN
Defendant:
DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON, EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE GODWIN
Defendant:
D. HOLMES, EDWARDS and SIS STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowes-Northern v. Choices Hotel International et al
as 2:2021cv00331
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Choices Hotel International, Illinois Department of Children Services, Michael Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00779
Petitioner:
Quintin Holmes
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
