Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Viera v. P.A.R.I. Independent Living Center, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00769
Plaintiff: Nina Viera
Defendant: P.A.R.I. Independent Living Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55620
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01817
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55623
Plaintiff - Appellant: MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55605
Plaintiff - Appellant: MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55332
Plaintiff - Appellee: MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U S Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of Department of Health Care Services of State of California
Independent Living Center of Southern California et al v. City of Los Angeles California et al
as 8:2012cv00062
Defendant: 12129 El Dorado Avenue LP, Adams 935 LP, Alexandria House Apartments LP and others
Plaintiff: Communities Actively Living Independent and Free, Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley and Independent Living Center of Southern California
Independent Living Center of Southern California et al v. City of Los Angeles California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00551
Plaintiff: Independent Living Center of Southern California, Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley and Communities Actively Living Independent and Free
Defendant: City of Los Angeles California, Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, 12129 El Dorado Avenue LP and others
Cross Defendant: Los Angeles Housing Partnership, Inc. and OL Hope, LP
Not Classified By Court: Bill Lann Lee and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55067
Plaintiff - Appellee: MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U S Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellant: TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of Department of Health Care Services of State of California

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?