Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Gomez v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co.
as 1:2017cv01172
Plaintiff:
Debra Gomez
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Soo Line Railroad Company v. Consolidated Rail Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corporation , CSX Transportation, Inc. , Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broz v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
as 2:2016cv00490
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J Broz
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Demos v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. et al
as 1:2016cv12235
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Union Pacific Corp., James R. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christensen v Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
as 2:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Michael Christensen
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
Bish et al v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
as 2:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
David Bish and Peter Woznicki
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
King v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
as 2:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
Matthew King
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
United States of America v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
as 2:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company , Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company Locomotive 3801 and Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company Locomotive 3802
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Henman v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv00434
Plaintiff:
Cory Henman
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
