Cases 21 - 30 of 237
Thomas Gage v. Keith Lynch, et al
as 23-1168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. LYNCH, construction official and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE
Halper v. Moore et al
as 1:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
Mark L. Harper and Mark L. Halper
Defendant:
Jerry D. Moore, Linda K. Moore, Michael J. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Juarez v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
Carlos Juarez
Defendant:
J. Lynch, Connie Gibson, S. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Maddox v. Lara et al
as 2:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
LeMonta Maddox
Defendant:
Y Lara, H. Mitchell, R. Haynie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunmore v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv01274
Plaintiff:
Mikal S. Dunmore, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Lynch, J. Leech and G. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Downs, Jr v. Jiminez et al
as 2:2022cv01021
Plaintiff:
Ivory Lewis Downs, Jr
Defendant:
M Jiminez, C. Tuyen, D Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morin v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Edward Morin
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Frieman v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Austin Frieman
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Williams v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Amir Williams
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Justice v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
