Cases 21 - 30 of 38
JOSEPH v. Reed et al
as 2:2009at00283
Plaintiff:
ALONZO JOSEPH
Defendant:
Reed, K Turner, K CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Saifullah v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2008cv01209
Plaintiff:
Khalifah E. D. Saifullah
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, S. R. Stiles, V. D. Brumfield and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manriquez v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv02427
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chism v. Ward et al
as 1:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
William H. Chism, III
Defendant:
J. Ward, Ken Clark, S. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01826
Plaintiff:
George I. Johnson
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, R. Pennington, E Gums and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grim v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01833
Plaintiff:
Abul Hasan Grim
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, P. Fandler, Abul Ra'oof Nasir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halfin v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01834
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hassan Halfin
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, P. Fandler, Abul Ra'oof Nasir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandifer v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01832
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, P. Fandler, Abul Ra'oof Nasir and others
Plaintiff:
Tasnim Abul Rasheed Sandifer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. State of California et al
as 1:2007cv01125
Plaintiff:
Sherry Coleman
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, James C. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chatman v. Adams et al
as 2:2007cv01211
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
Derrel G. Adams, B Espinosa, R M Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
