Cases 21 - 30 of 37
James McGee v. Elvin Valenzuela
as 14-72538
Petitioner:
JAMES COREY MCGEE
Respondent:
ELVIN VALENZUELA, Warden
James McGee v. Elvin Valenzuela
as 14-71668
Petitioner:
JAMES COREY MCGEE
Respondent:
ELVIN VALENZUELA, Warden
James McGee v. State of Nevada, et al
as 14-15754
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES COREY MCGEE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
MILLER v. SWEENY et al
as 2:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MILLER
Defendant:
CINDY SWEENY, PAUL LAGANA, JAMES NWAOGWUGWU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2013cv00082
Petitioner:
James Corey McGee
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County
as 3:2012cv00668
Petitioner:
James Corey McGee
Respondent:
Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. FedEx Freight et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Corey Adams
Defendant:
FedEx Freight and Michael R. Huffer
Movant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Trustees of the Carptenters' H v. Lanny Darr, II, et al
as 10-1793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUSTEES OF THE CARPTENTERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND OF ST. LOUIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LANNY HOWARD DARR, II, JAMES COREY MILLER and KIMBERLY MILLER
Trustees of the Carptenters' H v. Lanny Darr, II, et al
as 10-1682
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF THE CARPTENTERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND OF ST. LOUIS
Defendant - Appellant:
LANNY HOWARD DARR, II, JAMES COREY MILLER and KIMBERLY MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
