Cases 21 - 30 of 1,931
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lubner v. City of Cedarburg et al
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Mary Lubner
Defendant:
City of Cedarburg, Michael McNerney, Dustin Koehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
House v. Racine County et al
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D House
Defendant:
Racine County, Haley Beren and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of Wausau v. AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Defendant:
Executive Risk Indemnity Inc., Goodrich & Watson Insurers, Inc., Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
City of Wausau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Schlemm, David v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
David A. Schlemm
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, Edward Wall, Larry Fuchs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huss v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Huss
Defendant:
Deputy Woelfel, Investigator Glasel, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Ball et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Leon Banks
Defendant:
Denita R Ball, John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
