Cases 21 - 30 of 2,501
Doe et al v. MasterCorp Inc.
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Defendant:
MasterCorp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter v. Rosch et al
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Keith Almarode, Melissa Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
T'von Maurice Carter
Defendant:
Sheriff Antoinette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Carla Wade
Defendant:
Antionette Irving and John Doe Defendants 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Irving et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Trevelle Alexander Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Antionette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
Lea Holbrook, Dr. Happy Smith, Red Onion State Prison Medical Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennix v. Donley et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Kianese Pennix
Defendant:
Keith Donley, John Doe, Mercer Transportation Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
