Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Bergeron v. Garrison et al
as 1:2016cv00910
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Garrison, Multiple and Unnamed Agents of Cherokee County and Federal Bureau of Investigation National Dispatch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bergeron v. Garrison et al
as 1:2016cv00880
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Garrison, Multiple and Unnamed Agents of Cherokee County, Unknown Operators of Vehicles - Georgia License Plate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bergeron v. Garrison et al
as 1:2016cv00831
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Garrison and Unnamed Agent of Cherokee County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bergeron v. Baker et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Patty Baker and Candice Magana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bergeron v. Trizuto
as 2:2016cv00358
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
M Trizuto, J Holmes, J Rood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bergeron v. Bartow County Superior Court et al
as 4:2016cv00051
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Bartow County Superior Court, Smith, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bergeron v. McElyea et al
as 1:2016cv00647
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Ellen McElyea, Patty Baker and Candace Magana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jacob Andrew Bergeron v. Nathan Deal et al
as 2:2016cv01274
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Nathan Deal, Garrison, Theodore Jackson and others
Bergeron v. James et al
as 1:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Robert J. James, David McDade, Benjamin Von Schuch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bergeron v. Shoreline Court et al
as 2:2015cv01326
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Shoreline Court, Kevin Smith, Shoreline Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
