Cases 21 - 30 of 110
TORRES et al v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
JOSE TORRES, RAYMOND GOURGUE, ALBARO ALVAREZ and others
Defendant:
NANCY GIROUX, MICHAEL CLARK, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farley v. Eckard et al
as 3:2015cv00955
Petitioner:
James Edward Farley
Respondent:
J. A. Eckard, PA State Attorney General and Susquehanna County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITTED v. PRES. B. OBAMA et al
as 3:2013cv00278
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD WHITTED
Respondent:
PRES. B. OBAMA, E. HOLDER and M. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EDWARDS v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv05449
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Heller v. Bueki et al
as 1:2013cv02360
Plaintiff:
James Edward Heller
Defendant:
Phillip Bueki, Joseph Kameen and Gregory Chelak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
James Edward Key
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NALLS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2013cv00031
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD NALLS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv05856
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD CLARK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HIRSCH v. NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2012cv01352
Plaintiff:
LORI HIRSCH and F.H.
Defendant:
NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT and JAMES EDWARD FURLONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. WALSH
as 2:2012cv00805
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD KING
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
