Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 227
King v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv02482
Plaintiff: James E. King, Jr. and James King, Jr.
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
King v. Brann et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff: James King
Defendant: Judge Matthew Brann, Court Administrator Janelle, Kyle Rude and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KING et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04038
Plaintiff: MARY KING and JAMES KING
Defendant: MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eddie James King v. Wade W. Herring, III, et al
as 22-12774
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant / Appellee: WADE WILKES HERRING, III and ALISON L. CURRIE
Michael DeAngelis v. Noah Nagy, et al
as 22-1565
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL DEANGELIS
Defendant / Appellee: NOAH NAGY, Warden, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, M.D.O.C. Director, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR T. COBB and others
Albright et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00849
Plaintiff: Ty Albright, Patricia Allison, Damaris Andrea and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Albright et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00849
Plaintiff: Albright, Ty Albright, Patricia Allison and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
KING v. HERRING et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff: EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant: WADE W HERRING, III and ALISON L CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip King v. Perry Russell, et al
as 22-15720
Petitioner / Appellant: PHILLIP JAMES KING
Respondent / Appellee: PERRY RUSSELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Spirdione v. WASHINGTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv11018
Plaintiff: Nicolas Spirdione and Nicholas Spirdione
Defendant: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Richard D. Russell, Noah Nagy and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?