Cases 21 - 30 of 38
USA v. Javier Soto-Sanchez
as 14-10103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAVIER SOTO-SANCHEZ, AKA Moises Mondragon Soto, AKA Javier SotoSanchez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Javier Soto-Sanchez
as 13-10163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAVIER SOTO-SANCHEZ
Jesus Ixta-Salazar v. United State
as 12-3439
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jesus A. Ixta-Salazar, also known as David J. Feliciano-Soto, also known as David Javier Soto
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Jesus Ixta-Salazar v. United State
as 12-1472
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jesus A. Ixta-Salazar, also known as David J. Feliciano-Soto, also known as David Javier Soto
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Javier Soto
as 10-50783
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAVIER SOTO, also known as Buddha
Rodriguez et al v. Gulf Management, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv01120
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Rodriguez , Javier Soto , Aldo Fajardo and others
Defendant:
Gulf Management, Inc. and Steven Code
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Francisco Soto-Martinez
as 10-50112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER SOTO-MARTINEZ, also known as Antonio Soto Martinez, also known as Alberto Cantara, also known as Alberto Alcantara Sanchez, also known as Fernando Soto Sanchez, also known as Javier Martinez-Ramirez, also known as Alberto Allandafe Sanche
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
