Cases 21 - 30 of 887
SIMS v. JENSEN et al
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
JENSEN, YARBER, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
LONI YOLANDA CHAMBERS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbourn v. Balon et al
as 2:2023cv00363
Defendant:
Jeffrey Balon, Jeff Balon, Lawrence and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Wilbourn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GUILIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Elzey v. Huntington County et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey
Defendant:
Huntington County, Indiana State of, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Carl Jeffrey Banks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GODDARD et al v. HENLEY et al
as 1:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GODDARD and PATRICIA GODDARD
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER D HENLEY, LOWE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and CHRISTOPHER D. HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Larkin v. Segal
as 3:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Defendant:
Jeff Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larkin v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2023cv00685
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larkin v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2023cv00686
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
