Cases 21 - 30 of 53
CLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv86372
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLAYTON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05927
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLAYTON FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Bettys v. Kevin Quigley, et al
as 18-35285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E BETTYS
Defendant:
KEVIN QUIGLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLI CORYELL, ELENA LOPEZ, JUSTIN GRIMM and others
Robert Smith, et al v. State of Washington, et al
as 18-35263
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN MALONE, Robert Smith, other, GEORGE O. MITCHELL, Michael Johnson, other, DARREN PERKINS, Glenn Tilton, other and others
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN QUIGLEY, Secretary, Washington Department of Social Health Services, JOHN CLAYTON, Assistant Secretary of Juvenile Justice and Rehabilitation, Washington Department of Social Services, MARK STRONG, Chief Medical Director, Washington State Special Commitment Center and others
Samuel Donaghe v. Patrisha Lashway, et al
as 17-35919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRISHA LASHWAY, JOHN CLAYTON, WILLIAM VAN HOOK and others
Skinner v. City of Missoula et al
as 9:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Clayton Skinner, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Missoula, Missoula Police Department, John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Herrick v. Kevin Quigley, et al
as 17-35042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD HERRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN QUIGLEY, JOHN CLAYTON, MARK STRONG and others
Donaghe v. Lashway et al
as 3:2016cv05973
Plaintiff:
Sam Donaghe
Defendant:
Patrisha Lashway, Kevin Quigley, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
