Cases 21 - 30 of 246
Raleem et al v. Ward et al
as 5:2015cv13104
Plaintiff:
Raleem, Iesha Northington, Chris Jackson and others
Defendant:
A. Ward, Kevin Rogers, G. Kamin and others
Hunter #242663 v. Custin et al
as 1:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Hunter #242663
Defendant:
Kent Custin, John Prelesnik, Barbara Meagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard Bradford-Bey v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 15-1521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD BRADFORD-BEY, named as Lenard Bradford-Bey, [Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc. Reincarnate Temple of Detroit (MSTAR)] Acting on Behalf of The Class Of Washitaw Muurs Institutionalized Within The Michigan Department Of Corrections Practicing
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, MICHAEL MARTIN, ROBERT WILCOXSON-BEY and others
Terrence Taylor v. John Prelesnik
as 15-1248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE LEE TAYLOR, aka Terrance Lee Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden
Leo Abby v. John Prelesnik
as 15-1149
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEO M. ABBY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK
John Doe 1, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICK SNYDER, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Bradford #131806 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00679
Plaintiff:
Leonard Bradford #131806
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns , Michael Martin, Unknown Wilcoxson-Bey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Reaster v. John Prelesnik
as 14-1705
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT REASTER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK
Lacy Jr. # 141241 v. Duell et al
as 1:2014cv00537
Defendant:
Randy Duell, Deanna Arksey, Crystal Galvan-Casas and others
Plaintiff:
George Lee Lacy # 141241, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deandre Riley v. John Prelesnik
as 14-1570
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEANDRE RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
