Cases 21 - 30 of 79
RISENHOOVER v. LAW OFFICES OF NEIL HARE et al
as 1:2019cv03511
Defendant:
SHELLEY HYMES, JULIAN LIN, LISA COLANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADMUS v. CHECKR, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03459
Defendant:
CHECKR, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
RICHARD R. CADMUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HEARD v. MEXICANS et al
as 1:2019cv02054
Defendant:
MEXICANS, V. PUTIN, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEARD v. MEXICANS et al
as 1:2019cv02378
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, MEXICANS, JOHN AND JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEARD v. MEXICANS et al
as 1:2019cv02202
Defendant:
MEXICANS, JOHN AND JANE DOES and MUSLIMS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
H.U.C.U. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01964
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, JOHN C SANDERS, JONATHAN HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
M.G.B.V., H.U.C.U. and G.M.C.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC., et al v. GAUBATZ et al
as 1:2009cv02030
Defendant:
CHRIS GAUBATZ, PAUL DAVID GAUBATZ, DAVID MARSHALL and others
Plaintiff:
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS, CAIR-FOUNDATION, INC. and COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
