Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Heard v. Kane et al
as 2:2013cv12396
Plaintiff:
Rodney Heard
Defendant:
Robert Kane , Patrick Hammill, Jones Marvin and others
Nelson #245159 v. Balk et al
as 1:2012cv00694
Plaintiff:
Gerald Nelson #245159
Defendant:
Bradley Balk and Patty Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kane v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2011cv15421
Plaintiff:
Edward G Kane
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Pascowski et al
as 1:2011cv00793
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Mark Pascowski , Mike Smith , Adam Holliday and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv11505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kane v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. et al
as 1:2009cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sam E. Kane, Jr.
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Kane v. Bell
as 2:2009cv12393
Petitioner:
Patrick Kane
Respondent:
Thomas K Bell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Wendrow et al v. Michigan Department of Human Services et al
as 2:2008cv14324
Plaintiff:
Thal Flam Wendrow and Julian Wendrow
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Human Services, Ismael Ahmed, Kriste Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mona v. Citigroup Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv13611
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Mona
Defendant:
Citigroup Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Incorporated, Salomon Smith Barney Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
