Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Fleming v. Billinter et al
as 1:2015cv00943
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kane Fleming
Defendant:
Johny Billinter, Doug Baker and Dores Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Poston v. Kane et al
as 1:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Poston
Defendant:
Kane, Tracy Jones, Eric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kane v. Advantage Guard Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Falilou Kane
Defendant:
Advantage Guard Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA et al
as 1:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Mark Bell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Tim Kane, Department of Correction of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gholson et al v. The Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 2:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lonnie M. Gholson, The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Mark R. Davis and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Mark Davis, Janet Reno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hardiman et al
as 3:2009cv00244
Plaintiff:
Gino V. Jackson
Defendant:
Phong Michael Hardiman, Daniel M. Chichester, Eric L. Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Jackson v. Olsen et al
as 3:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Gino V. Jackson
Defendant:
Eric L. Olsen, Daniel M. Chichester, Phong Michael Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Brown et al
as 1:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
Gino V. Jackson
Defendant:
Joseph T. Brown, Kristie L. Kane, David P. Baugh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
