Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven E Platt v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2010cv05868
Defendant:
Does, Karen Hawkins, Hooper Holmes Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Steven E Platt
Plaintiff:
Steven E Platt
Counter Claimant:
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Brathwaite v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00646
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Brathwaite
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, Christopher Klien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 10-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, RICK KEARNEY, MIKE COSTELLO and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. LITTLE
Rainier v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Rainier, Sr.
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beckles et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Scaroborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Karen Hawkin
as 09-4679
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KAREN HAWKINS
Hawkins et al v. McElroy Metal Mill, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Wayland Hawkins and Karen Hawkins
Defendant:
McElroy Metal Mill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
