Cases 1 - 10 of 33
USA v. Gier
as 23-30906
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Karen Hawkins Gier
USA v. Gier
as 23-30719
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Karen Hawkins Gier
Barnhart et al v. Azar
as 6:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Plaintiff:
Karen Hawkins, Terri Anderson-Black, April Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
Gregory Robinson v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 15-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY F. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, LT. TRADER, LT. MARK D. DAUM and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, MAJOR SCAROBOROUGH, STAFF LT. KAREN HAWKINS and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Phelps, et al
as 15-1803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLIEN and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 14-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLEIN and others
Hawkins v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv26174
Plaintiff:
Karen Hawkins
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv20514
Plaintiff:
Karen Hawkins and James Hawkins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
