Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rankin v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
as 6:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Rankin
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, Laura McCullough, Harry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
elaga-bey v. Matthews et al
as 1:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
taqi elaga-bey
Defendant:
Kimberley Matthews, Kate Harrenstein and Gerlinde Berry
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Gillispie v. Federal Bureau of Investigators et al
as 1:2016cv03083
Plaintiff:
Kim Marie Gillispie
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigators, Fred Roselli, Victimized Families and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kates v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00072
Petitioner:
Travis Tyrone Kates
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The Aspen Brands Holding Company et al v. Wish Rocket, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01208
Plaintiff:
The Aspen Brands Holding Company , Kate Aspen, Inc. and Smart Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Wish Rocket, LLC, Cheapfavorshop.com, Inc., Weddingfavors.org, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Reid v. Lanier
as 1:2014cv03389
Plaintiff:
Perri Pebbles Reid
Defendant:
Kate Lanier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rumph v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00931
Plaintiff:
Annie Kate Rumph
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ambrose v. Bertucci-Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
Ebonnie Ambrose
Defendant:
Laura Bertucci-Smith, Caroline Kate Moreland and Carmen Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
