Cases 21 - 30 of 61
DIYA et al v. BYRNES et al
as 2:2017cv03536
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DMOTOMIWA DIYA and TRACY ROY MARTIN
Defendant:
BYRNES, JOHN D. SWIDER, COMPANY OF KEEFE - TKC HOLDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EAVES v. WALKER et al
as 2:2017cv00886
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY EAVES
Defendant:
MR. FRANK WALKER, MONICA CWYNAR, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
TALBERT v. KEEFE GROUP
as 2:2016cv05543
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
KEEFE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HASSAN v. TEAM LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv06445
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED HASSAN
Defendant:
TEAM LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, INC., MICHAEL N. O-KEEFE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fetters et al v. Mearkle et al
as 1:2015cv01935
Plaintiff:
Diane Fetters , Daniel Kassick and Dale Kassick
Defendant:
Lisa Mearkle, Charles Dowell , Bradley Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'KEEFE et al v. METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv05499
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN O'KEEFE and TIMOTHY O'KEEFE
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and FRANK O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
