Cases 21 - 30 of 34
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2015cv00299
Petitioner:
RODNEY L. DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAVIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00366
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE L. DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. KRUSE WORLDWIDE COURIER, LTD. et al
as 1:2011cv00853
Defendant:
LANCE ADAMS and KRUSE WORLDWIDE COURIER, LTD.
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA L. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
DAVIS et al v. CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS
as 1:2011cv00771
Defendant:
CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS
Plaintiff:
RICKEY L. DAVIS and SHERONDA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Talbert Manufacturing Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Veronica L Davis
Defendant:
Talbert Manufacturing Inc
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Talbert Manufacturing Inc
Thirdparty_defendant:
Crews Tansport Inc and Hale Trailer Brake and Wheel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Price et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Richard L Davis
Defendant:
Jerry L Price, M Heckman, David E Lain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution Inc
as 3:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kristie L Davis, Kristie L Davis, Karla J Funnell and others
Defendant:
Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Tonica L Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
