Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
L&G Rubin Family Trust v. Soufun Holdings Limited et al
as 2:2015cv08508
Plaintiff:
L and G Rubin Family Trust, Anthony Maresca and Ling Li
Petitioner:
James O'Toole
Defendant:
Soufun Holdings Limited, Vincent Tianquan Mo and Lanying Guan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Fan et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv02686
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and David L. Roark
Plaintiff:
Zhuoying Fan and Ling Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Monterroso et al v. L. Szechuan East, LTD. et al
as 1:2014cv05469
Plaintiff:
Edgar Monterroso
Defendant:
L. Szechuan East, LTD. , How Ling Li and Hui Fong Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Li v. Holder
as 14-1800
Petitioner:
Ling Li, AKA Li Ling
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Baosteel Resources International Company Limited v. Li et al
as 1:2013cv08475
Plaintiff:
Baosteel Resources International Company Limited
Defendant:
Ling Li , Songquiang Chen , Metawise Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zhenhua Logistics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. v. Metamining, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02658
Plaintiff:
Zhenhua Logistics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Metamining, Inc. , Ouro Mining, Inc. , Ling Li and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
