Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Johnson v. Sterlin et al
as 6:2021cv03207
Plaintiff:
Alvin Johnson
Defendant:
Director Brian Sterlin, Capt. C. Livings, Lt. R. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Marquille Livingston v. The State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2021cv02763
Plaintiff:
Marquille Livingston
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina, Alan Wilson, Leon Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. Waccamaw Mental Health et al
as 4:2021cv02247
Plaintiff:
Molly Keel
Defendant:
Waccamaw Mental Health, Kathy Ward, Donno Lupo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hair v. Parker et al
as 2:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
Izell D Hair
Defendant:
C. Parker and Mrs Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2020cv03812
Plaintiff:
Debra R. Livingston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Knox v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 6:2020cv03127
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center, Madaline Jean Mathis, Marie Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv03036
Defendant:
Captain Livingstone, Anthony Howard Hall and Captain Reese
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Witherspoon et al
as 2:2020cv02537
Plaintiff:
Derry Drunt Livingston
Defendant:
Horry County, Horry County Police Department, The and Jackie C Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
