Cases 21 - 30 of 400
MCGILL v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CURTIS MCGILL
Defendant:
D. LOCKLEAR, J. OSUNA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilson v. Locklear
as 5:2023hc02234
Petitioner:
Jarrell Damont Wilson
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cagle v. Ransom et al
as 5:2023ct03287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Cagle
Defendant:
G. Ransom, J. Hunt, Marie Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. Locklear
as 5:2023hc02217
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPRY v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES SPRY
Defendant:
JON DOE, JANE DOE, WAKENDA GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Harris et al
as 5:2023ct03248
Plaintiff:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Defendant:
Amanda Harris, Ronnie Chavis, Teon Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehurst v. Locklear et al
as 5:2023ct03236
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Victor Locklear, Bruce Hodges, Sean T. Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORENO et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
ALMA MORENO, AMINAH HAWLEY, ANNETTE KRAVITZ and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
