Cases 21 - 30 of 108
Dixon et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Michael Anthony King, United States of America and Emily Gail Roberts
Plaintiff:
Lauria McDuffy, Anthony Hull and Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Monroe v. Lauria
as 2:2020cv04676
Plaintiff:
Carren Monroe
Defendant:
Angela M Lauria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Monroe v. Lauria
as 5:2020cv04676
Plaintiff:
Carren Monroe
Defendant:
Angela M Lauria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lauria v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv00210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Chris Heitstuman
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lauria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
LAURIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89149
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAURIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEADOWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41788
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAURIA MEADOWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDUFFEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30057
Plaintiff:
LAURIA MCDUFFEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Andreas Kohler v. Rubin Glickman, et al
as 19-16909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREAS KOHLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FRANK LAURIA, an individual and present / former employee of the United States Government, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Kohler v. Glickman et al
as 3:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, Rubin Glickman and others
Plaintiff:
Andreas Kohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
