Cases 21 - 30 of 4,027
SCHAPPELL v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE LEE SCHAPPELL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hollinger et al v. Menges et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Terry-Lee: Hollinger and Michelle-Lynn: Hollinger
Defendant:
Judge Matthew D. Menges, Allison Blew, Sheriff Richard P. Keuleber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Bridget Lee Foster
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SHAW v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Shaw
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Townsend v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Lee Townsend
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GUTHRIE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE GUTHRIE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
ALEXANDER v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
LEE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and JACOB SECORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TOWNSEND v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
LEE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
JO BENNETT
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, BARRY S ALEXANDER, SAMANTHA J BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
