Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Lusk v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv25593
Plaintiff: Kathy Arlene Lusk
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lusk et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10284
Plaintiff: Patty C. Lusk and Dewey Lusk
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Huntington Police Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04714
Plaintiff: Kenard Moore
Defendant: Huntington Police Department, City of Huntington, Officer Lusk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00329
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Encompass Indemnity Company v. Phillips et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00098
Plaintiff: Encompass Indemnity Company
Defendant: Clifford C. Phillips , Betty Joe Phillips , Alex Lusk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Hackett et al v. Lusk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00781
Plaintiff: Latoya Hackett , Betty Jo Radford and Joseph Jeremaine Porter
Defendant: Ronald Lusk and City of Huntington, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lusk v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00005
Petitioner: Hubert Lusk
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClanahan et al v. Eastern Associated Coal, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv01068
Plaintiff: Debra McClanahan, Donnie Osborne, James Goodwin and others
Defendant: Eastern Associated Coal, LLC, Peabody Energy Corporation, Peabody Holding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Type: Real Property None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?