Cases 21 - 30 of 87
AARON et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05819
Plaintiff:
VICKIE AARON , HELEN ADAMS , CAROLYN ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHN DOE v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2013cv05156
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, KORNBERG SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, NEIL D. THEOBALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03732
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2013cv00628
Plaintiff:
ERVING SMITH
Defendant:
STACEE M. JOHNSON , ELISHA SAVANNAH and BILL MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv05083
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, LLC , WALGREEN'S DISTRIBUTION CENTER, INC. , WALGREEN EASTERN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv03185
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, LLC , WALGREEN'S DISTRIBUTION CENTER, INC. , WALGREEN EASTERN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Aderhold
as 3:2012cv00100
Defendant:
Aderhold
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Bledsoe
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Karpin
as 3:2012cv00098
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Karpin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59129
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
