Cases 21 - 30 of 220
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Ali Bey v. McCandless
as 1:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Maurice Marbury Elohim Ali Bey
Defendant:
Officer McCandless, Kellie Thomson, Cary Pardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Copeland v. Kelly et al
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dinell Maurice Copeland
Defendant:
Brendan Kelly and Butler County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Judge Gary G. Cook and Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Toledo Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Toledo Police Department, Detective Kozlaker, K. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Maurice Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2021cv01002
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Maurice Adams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Moore v. Toledo Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Toledo Police Department, Detective M. Kozlaker, Officer K. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Ohio Adult Parole Authorities et al
as 3:2021cv01808
Petitioner:
Maurice L. Jefferson
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authorities and Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
