Cases 21 - 30 of 196
May v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Donald Lamar May
Defendant:
Heath Jackson and Lieutenant Pat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chapman Rogers Mays
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reyes v. The United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Gay Lynn Reyes
Defendant:
The United States Department of Justice, The State of Alabama, The State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv08007
Petitioner:
James A Mays, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Donald Lamar May
Defendant:
Heath Jackson, Todd Stearns and Hawsey Jeremy London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
May et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Charles A May, Tessa May and Charles A. May
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Bank of America, N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Charles Fleming
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cohen v. Hill et al
as 2:2021cv01361
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Cohen, Jr
Defendant:
Willie Hill, Major Cleveland Moore, David Agee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Alabama Plumbing Contractor LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01176
Plaintiff:
James May
Defendant:
Alabama Plumbing Contractor LLC and Brent Vacarella
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
