Cases 21 - 30 of 39
CARRUTHERS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CARRUTHERS
Defendant:
DOUG EVANS, PATTY LEE FOREMAN, K. HARTZELL and others
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCPHERSON v. JONES
as 1:2017cv03634
Defendant:
ADAM JONES
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MCPHERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briley v. Lawson et al
as 3:2017cv00522
Plaintiff:
Raymond A Briley
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Unknown, Mr McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01947
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
MCPHERSON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00013
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ANTHONY MCPHERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GRUND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2014cv00875
Respondent:
TAMMY ATWOOD, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, LYTTLE and others
Petitioner:
SUSAN GRUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McPherson v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01474
Plaintiff:
Dana McPherson
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENNIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
BELINDA DENNIS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE FIVE, JOHN DOE FOUR, JOHN DOE ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TIBBETT v. McPHERSON et al
as 4:2013cv00004
Defendant:
WILLIAM ABBOTT, CITY OF SEYMOUR, INDIANA, BRIAN MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TIBBETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
