Cases 21 - 30 of 171
Alspaugh #852435 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Andrew Alspaugh #852435
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Jerome L. Warfield, Sr. and Melissa K. Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White #285964 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of State Police, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
woodard v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2018cv10534
Plaintiff:
howard allen woodard
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Michigan Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LaPine v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 4:2018cv10516
Petitioner:
Darrin LaPine
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board and Warden of St. Louis Correctional Facility
McGore v. Michigan Parole Board Members et al
as 2:2018cv10355
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board Members, Michael Egan and Bill Schuette
Cannon v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv14173
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cannon
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Melinda Braman and others
Lawson #925233 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lawson #925233
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Susan A. Wilson, Edwin M. Heap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mengel v. Michigan Parole Board
as 2:2017cv13471
Petitioner:
Peter Mengel
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board
Sturgis v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis #566328
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Sonia Warchok and Ricardo R. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgis v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv13228
Plaintiff:
Donald Sturgis
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Sonia Warchok and Ricardo R. Moore
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
